fbpx

You are viewing our site as a Broker, Switch Your View:

Agent | Broker     Reset Filters to Default     Back to List
You have viewed all your free articles this month


Due to the ongoing situation with Covid-19, we are offering 3 months free on the agent monthly membership with coupon code: COVID-19A

UNLIMITED ACCESS

With an RE Technology membership you'll be able to view as many articles as you like, from any device that has a valid web browser.

Purchase Account

NOT INTERESTED?

RE Technology lets you freely read 5 pieces of content a Month. If you don't want to purchase an account then you'll be able to read new content again once next month rolls around. In the meantime feel free to continue looking around at what type of content we do publish, you'll be able sign up at any time if you later decide you want to be a member.

Browse the site

ARE YOU ALREADY A MEMBER?

Sign into your account

March Madness, Competition, and Upstream

March 20 2017

data exchange computersAhhh... March Madness. I love everything about it. Team dynamics, competition, and the sheer will to win. If you give any credence to the media, you'd think there's a game to be won within the real estate industry for control of data management. That's understandable. Looking at how our industry has evolved over the past 18 months, it's clear that most data vendors and portals also see the need for an "Upstream-like" data repository. Many vendors and portals (and some MLSs) have either introduced one or are working on one.

So we seem to have a consensus that property data must be better managed, and perhaps in a single source location. The question is no longer "Is it needed?" but "Who is the best entity to create and operate the database?" Every entity creating their personal "Upstream" is fighting to obtain a significant critical mass of data to ensure they become the standard for data management and control.

Vendors will position their "Upstream" as a free (or nearly free) incentive to leverage your collective data to get you to commit to their products and services. There is no free lunch: what is given away up front always has a price somewhere down the line. It's a familiar model that portals have used to move into a control position for consumer website interaction. As an industry, we gave up that position of control and, without efforts like Upstream, are precariously headed there again.

To be clear, these are not evil companies trying to destroy our industry. They rely on our industry for their livelihood, but make no mistake: they do not share our goals and objectives. They are looking to monetize the data for the benefit of their company, while brokers are looking to manage the data to benefit our industry. There's nothing wrong with either, but the two will not always be aligned. The good news is that both a for-profit and an industry centered solution will benefit the consumer in cleaner, more accurate data so consumer benefit need not be drawn into the conversation.

TO READ THE REST OF THE STORY LOGIN OR REGISTER.